#Novels for early thirties man reader how to#

That new round of cash to fight the measure came from those who would be most likely to pay a new income surtax, should it pass (i.e. That may explain why the campaign raised an extra $2.1 million last Friday alone. Though the spending data isn’t public yet, the No campaign says it plans to broadcast the ad across the state at a “seven-figure” cost. Which of the 2022 California ballot measures do you support or oppose? 30: “It is disappointing that the Governor would side with the California Republican Party and a handful of San Francisco billionaires who would rather kids breathe toxic, polluted air than pay their fair share.” A statement from Clean Air California, the coalition supporting Prop.But according to an internal poll conducted by the “No” camp, those numbers flipped when its respondents were informed that the state’s top Democrat doesn’t like it. A July survey of likely voters in California found that 63% support the concept of the initiative. Yes, that Newsom, who wants to phase out the use of gas-powered cars by 2035.įor the No camp, adopting the governor’s chiseled face as a campaign logo is a calculated political move. Standing against the measure are the Chamber of Commerce and the California Republican Party, but also the California Teachers Association and, as the new ad makes very clear, Newsom. 30 is a crucial effort to meet the urgency of the moment.” San Francisco Chronicle: “The clock is ticking to decarbonize California.Now the editorial board at the governor’s hometown paper has weighed in. One one side: Lyft, facing a regulatory deadline to electrify its fleet of cars, has teamed up with environmental activists, the California Democratic Party and some of the same labor groups that so vociferously opposed the ride-hailing company’s successful bid in 2020 to exempt itself from a law making it harder to classify workers as independent contractors. The battle over that measure may be the clearest recent example of how politics makes strange bedfellows. 30 is a Trojan horse that puts corporate welfare above the fiscal welfare of our entire state.”

#Novels for early thirties man reader how to#

The opponents of Proposition 30, a proposal to tax millionaires to fund electric car incentives and infrastructure, want California voters to keep one thing in mind when they decide how to vote on the measure:Ī new “No on 30” ad features the governor - and only the governor - speaking out against the proposal in no uncertain terms.